What kind of conduct is not justified when using deadly force?

When considering the use of deadly force, the concept revolves around the necessity, justification, and intent behind the action taken. Willful, malicious, or criminally negligent conduct is not justified because such behavior indicates a deliberate choice to harm or a reckless disregard for the safety of others. In the context of deadly force, an individual should only use it in defense of themselves or others against imminent threats to life or severe bodily harm.

In contrast to willful or malicious actions, protective conduct usually relates to reasonable responses to threats where one could claim self-defense or defense of others. Accidental harm indicates an unintended consequence, which does not align with the intent required to justify deadly force. Emergency response actions may also encompass situations where reasonable force can be used to protect or save lives, but they must be executed within the bounds of the law and ethical responsibilities. Thus, the lack of justification for willful, malicious, or criminally negligent conduct stems from the ethical and legal imperative to act responsibly and proportionately when facing a threat.