Is it permissible to handcuff an assailant after they have been shot?

The ability to handcuff an assailant after they have been shot is permissible if necessary for safety. This approach is grounded in the principles of ensuring officer safety, victim safety, and ensuring that the assailant does not pose a further threat to others or themselves.

When an assailant has been shot, their condition may vary widely—some may be incapacitated while others could still pose a risk. Handcuffing in such situations serves multiple purposes: it prevents an assailant from potentially harming the responding officers, it ensures that medical personnel can safely attend to the assailant without the risk of retaliation, and it protects the rights of the accused by ensuring they cannot flee or further injure themselves in a tense environment.

The other scenarios listed are limited and do not consider the dynamic nature of law enforcement activities. One must assess each situation individually based on the perceived threat and the context of the engagement.